1411P - Methylation analysis of MLH1 using droplet digital PCR and methylation sensitive restriction enzyme

Abstract

BackgroundLynch syndrome (LS) is caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes being MLH1 and MSH2 the most commonly mutated. By contrast MLH1 inactivation as the result of promoter methylation is strongly indicative of a sporadic cancer, providing LS exclusion criteria for 85% of high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) tumours. Here we present a cost effective strategy enabling to test methylation of MLH1 promoter without bisulfite conversion and with minimal DNA quantity requirement. MethodsAfter macrodissection from HE stained slides, DNA was extracted from FFPE tissue sections of colorectal carcinomas. A droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was performed using two reactions mix. A 270-bp region of the MLH1 promoter (chr3:36993151-36993420) is amplified in the presence/absence of HinP1I, a methylation sensitive restriction enzyme, targeting 3 CpG islands. Analysis was made by the QuantaSoft™ (Bio-Rad) software which calculates amplicon concentrations between the 2 reactions to obtain a percentage of MLH1 methylation. Sensitivity of the technique was assigned to 5% of methylation with a minimal DNA concentration of 5ng. ResultsMethylation analysis by ddPCR was compared to pyrosequencing combined with bisulfite conversion for 65 samples and a 100% concordance was obtained. Moreover 10 samples were analysed by ddPCR and MethylLight RealTime-PCR with the same concordance. After validation, the technique was implemented in the clinical diagnosis and, in one year, out the 79 MMR-deficient colorectal carcinomas analysed, 60 (76 %) were MLH1-methylated tumours. ConclusionsThis ddPCR sequencing combining methylation sensitive restriction enzyme is a cost-effective strategy, requiring less technical turn around time and minimal DNA quantity as compared to standard analysis. Moreover, this technique could be further used for other promoter methylation analysis (such as MGMT) and on circulating tumoral DNA. Legal entity responsible for the studyThe authors. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.