Abstract

Objective:Even though the severity of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) has decreased with the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy, mild forms of HAND remain prevalent. Many HIV-infected individuals live alone, so mild cognitive impairments are easily missed. It is important to check their neurocognitive and everyday functions during hospital visits; however, it is challenging for Japanese clinicians because many hospitals do not have enough clinical psychologists or neuropsychologists. Additionally, neuropsychological (NP) test results may not detect those mild cognitive impairments. A micro error has been given more attention as a new behavioral sign of the early stages of cognitive decline, especially among people with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). The current study aimed to 1) develop a touch-panel HAND screening battery and 2) evaluate if the micro errors could differentiate individuals with HAND from their counterpart healthy individuals.Participants and Methods:Forty HIV-infected men (age: 49.0±8.51 years old, education: 18.5±2.17 years) and 44 healthy men (age: 45.4±8.49 years old, education: 14.4±2.27 years) completed the touch-panel HAND screening battery which assessed six NP domains by seven subtests, everyday functions, and depression. A micro error is defined as a subtle action disruption or hesitation occurring immediately before making final actions. We evaluated the micro errors in short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM) of verbal learning tests (VLT).Results:Mann Whitney U tests revealed that the HIV+ group made significantly more micro errors on both STM (HIV+: 1.45±0.90 times, Healthy: 0.52±0.84 times) and LTM (HIV+: 1.85±0.73 times, Healthy: 1.29±0.71 times) than the healthy group (STM: W=1362, p< .001, Effect Size (EF)= .548; LTM: W=1199.5, p= .002, EF= .363). An independent samples T-test showed that the HAND group made significantly more micro errors than the non-HAND group (t=1.822, p= .038, ES= .595) on STM; moreover, the Asymptomatic Neurocognitive Impairment (ANI) group made significantly more micro errors than the healthy group (W=446, p< .001, ES= .689). On LTM, no significant micro error differences between HAND and non-HAND (W=184.5, p= .539, ES= -.189) nor between ANI and healthy group (W=327.5, p= .103, ES= .241) were found.Conclusions:The present study suggests that a novel behavioral measure, micro errors, may be able to help detect even the mildest form of HAND, ANI. Given that the touch-panel HAND screening battery consists of NP and IADL tests, it is important to evaluate micro errors on these various measures. Additionally, the touch-panel screening battery requires minimal administrative staff involvement, which could be beneficial for busy HIV clinicians.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call