Abstract

Abstract Background Deep neck infections (DNI’s) are uncommon (~45,000 US cases annually) but, potentially serious. Published data regarding bacteriology and antibiotic usage for DNI’s in children is limited. In addition, geographic variation in the incidence of pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility limits generalization of treatment guidance. Reviewing our practice at Akron childrens we noted considerable variation in the choice of empiric antibiotics (ampicillin-sulbactam vs piperacillin-tazobactam vs Ceftriaxone and Clindamycin/vancomycin/linezolid). Admission unit (floors vs intensive care) and service (hospitalist vs infectious diseases) were some important determinants that influenced choice of empiric antibiotics. This retrospective study aimed to review local data and come up with standard guidance for empiric therapy. Summary of the predominant bacterial isolates. Methods We reviewed records of 125 patients who underwent surgical drainage of DNI’s from 1/2015 – 12/2019. In addition to demographic data we gathered information on bacterial isolates and their susceptibilities. Chart review was performed for patients with staphylococcus aureus, to look for any unique presenting features. Results Up on reviewing the data- peritonsillar abscesses were common in older children (Median age 11 years). As expected, retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal infections were common in younger ones (< 5 years). Group A streptococcus remained the most common aerobic isolate followed by Hemophilus influenzae/parainfluenzae. MRSA was detected in ~7 % of all cultures (see enclosed table). Notably, none of the MRSA isolates were clindamycin resistant. However, MSSA resistance to clindamycin was about 20%. No clinical characters predicted isolation of S. aureus. Anaerobic infections (polymicrobial) were overwhelmingly common across all abscess types. Conclusion Based on our review, Ampicillin-Sulbactam is a good empiric choice antibiotic for deep neck infections in our institution. Ceftriaxone with clindamycin is another option. Clindamycin monotherapy seems to be inadequate. Staph aureus and especially MRSA, were only isolated in a small percentage of cases. Unless a patient is ill appearing, vancomycin use seems unnecessary. Clinical presentation was not helpful to suspect infection with Staph aureus. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call