131 How Horn Flies Could Be Affecting Your Beef herd's Reproductive Success

Abstract

Abstract Horn flies (HF) are one of the most prevalent external parasites on pastured cattle in North America, although they can be found worldwide. HF cause animals severe stress leading to increased cardiac and respiratory rates, and decreased feed efficiency, average daily gain, and milk production. All these detrimental effects caused by HF contribute to over $1 dollars in economic loss in the United States, annually. Current methods of reducing fly numbers, including manure management, feed additives, and insecticides, are being utilized with varying degrees of success. However, these methods require extensive management, are temporary, and are costly to producers. While several studies have investigated the effects of horn flies on growth and milk production traits, there have been very few studies on their potential impacts on reproduction in beef cattle. Insemination and calving data collected on cows and yearling heifers at Northwest Georgia Research and Education Center between 2015 to 2022 was used to determine the effect of HF abundance on fertility. Each animal was exposed to two insemination events. Artificial Insemination (AI) was used except for cows that did not get pregnant from the first AI which were placed on pasture with a proven bull for natural service. The outcomes (success/failure) of each insemination event and calving were recorded. Still births where the dam carried the calf to term, but the calf passed during parturition were recorded as successes. As part of a research project, no fly control methods were carried out on the farms during 2019 and 2022. During these years, images of each animal were taken twice between May and August. The best image of each animal was used to estimate HF count. Animals were placed in three abundance classes (Low: 0-150, Med: 151-400, High: 401+) to analyze the effects of fly abundance on reproduction. For the remaining years (2015-2018, 2020-2021) animals received fly control and were not assessed for fly abundance. As shown Table 1, conception rates of each breeding attempt and calving rates were lower in both years where no horn fly control was used (2019 and 2022) compared with the remaining years where fly control was utilized. The decrease in conception rates when no fly control was used suggests a detrimental effect of HF on reproductive success. Additionally, for the animals measured in 2022, the average fly count for the dams who did not calf successfully was 357 which is significantly higher than the average count for the dams who did successfully calf (290). This suggests that animals with greater fly loads are less likely to carry to term. These adverse effects on reproductive health could be mitigated by genetically selecting for animals that can tolerate a greater fly load.