Abstract

The divide between the protection of refugees and human rights that exists in theory and practice is a false one. A major pitfall has been lack of a treaty body mechanism with competence to decide on legality of measures pursued by States under the Refugee Convention. Human rights treaty bodies may remedy this defect. Although there are acknowledged constraints concerning the competence of these bodies to deal with refugee claims, the evidence shows that they have begun to address complaints by refugees in the context of protecting human rights. The challenges arise mainly on three fronts. The first is to articulate an international legal content of primary basis for protection of refugees. The second involves scope of non-refoulement by reference to human rights and gender-based claims. The third is with respect to synthesize the standards for treatment of refugees under Refugee Convention with those enumerated by human rights treaties. Keywords: gender-based claims; human rights treaty bodies; non-refoulement ; protecting human rights; protecting refugees; Refugee Convention

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.