1291 DO PATIENTS UNDERSTAND THEIR RESPECT FORMS? A QI PROJECT REVIEWING PHRASES USED AND WHETHER THEY ARE MEANINGFUL TO PATIENTS

Abstract

Abstract Background Hospital based Quality Improvement Project focusing on adapting language used on Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Treatment and Care (ReSPECT) forms to improve patient understanding. Introduction ReSPECT forms have been used to document patient wishes and appropriate escalation of treatment in our hospital since 2019. There continues to be a lack of understanding of phrases used amongst both patients and healthcare professionals; the hospital receives regular complaints. This project explored patients’ perceptions of language used and their thoughts on the ReSPECT discussion, to better guide discussions and documentation. Methods A questionnaire collecting qualitative and quantitative data was performed with 24 patients aged between 59-95 years old with ReSPECT forms on a medical ward (Geriatrics/ Endocrine). Results The phrases ‘DNACPR’ and ‘Not for ITU’ were understood by 5/24 patients (21%), ‘Ward based ceiling of care’ was understood by only 1/24 (4%) and ‘prioritising comfort care’ understood by 8/24 patients (34%). Only 6/24 (25%) of patients said they were a ‘little upset’ by their admission conversation about ReSPECT and no patients surveyed were ‘very upset’. Conclusions This first QI cycle found that overall, most patients did not understand the language commonly used on ReSPECT forms, particularly ‘ward-based ceiling of care’. The majority were not upset by the ReSPECT conversation, so a fear of upsetting the patient should not be a barrier to having a clear discussion. The next step in our QI work will be to explore phrases that are better understood by patients and then feedback findings so that we can develop a digital ReSPECT form with drop down options for phrases better understood by patients to describe ceilings of care.