Abstract
Abstract Introduction Pancreatitis represents a significant pathology in terms of morbidity and mortality and therefore it is important to be able to differentiate between mild and severe episodes. The objective nature of the Glasgow score and ability to predict severity make it a useful guide, however its use within GWH varies greatly. Method Both cycles of data collection occurred over one-month periods. Data was collected retrospectively of prospectively recorded data. Intervention implemented following the first audit cycle was a standardised proforma and the biochemistry lab instigated automated analysis of lactate dehydrogenase and calcium. Following this an identical audit was performed. In addition, the presence of CXR on admission and USS within 24hrs of admission was recorded. Results During the first audit cycle 44% of patients had a Glasgow score documented on admission, which improved to 63% after the second audit. There was a 17% improvement in USS scanning within 24 hours and a 50% increase in CXR being performed on admission following the second audit. Conclusions The changes implemented during the study have increased both the quantity and quality of the data recorded in patients admitted to GWH with pancreatitis. This should function to improve differentiation of those with mild episodes from those with severe.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.