1284 Comparison of British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) 2008 and NICE 2015 Guidelines for Patients with Suspected Urinary Tract Cancer: An Audit of Haematuria Referrals

Abstract

Abstract Introduction BAUS guidelines for the investigation of haematuria were replaced by NICE guidelines in 2015. However, both criteria are currently used to refer patients to our Haematuria Clinic. We audit the haematuria referrals made to our unit and compare cancer yield. Method A retrospective review of all two-week wait haematuria referrals to a single UK teaching hospital between October 2019 and April 2020 was performed. Referrals were stratified into two groups: BAUS 2008 and NICE 2015 referral criteria. The outcomes of haematuria investigations were analyzed and the incidence of urinary tract cancer (UTC) compared between groups. Results 316 referrals were analyzed. Of these, 123 (39%) and 193 (61%) referrals were made using BAUS and NICE criteria respectively. 233 (74%) patients were investigated for visible haematuria of which 68 (29%) were referred using BAUS criteria and 165 (71%) using NICE. UTC was identified in 20% of patients referred using NICE criteria and 4.4% using BAUS criteria. 83 (26%) patients were referred with non-visible haematuria. Of these, 55 (66%) were referred using BAUS criteria and 28 (34%) using NICE. UTC was identified in 2.5% of patients referred using BAUS criteria. No UTC was identified in referrals using NICE criteria. Conclusions Despite BAUS haematuria guidelines being superseded by NICE guidelines in 2015, these older guidelines still account for 40% of our two-week wait referrals. Furthermore, NICE guidelines have a higher cancer yield for visible haematuria compared to BAUS guidelines and should therefore take precedence to avoid subjecting patients to unnecessary and costly investigations.