Abstract

Abstract Aim To identify and challenge discriminatory EDI practices. To improve adoption of national policies on surgical headwear in theatre. Method Freedom of information requests were sent to 124 hospitals with emergency general surgery theatres. Data requested included total staff number, BAME staff percentage, theatre staff percentage, Muslim theatre staff (including ODPs, porters, medical, nursing staff, surgeons, junior doctors), female Muslim staff number, and copies of uniform policies, especially on religious headwear. Two senior trainees reviewed policies. Results 100 of 124 trusts responded to the FOI request. Percentage of BAME staff ranged from 5% to 47%. 12 trusts had no BAME members of staff working in theatres or could not release this data for risk of their few personal being identified. 97 policies were reviewed. 80% of the policies reviewed adhered or replicated the national guidance. Potentially discriminatory practices included necessitating disposable head wear be always worn, lack of specific guidance on the wearing of hijabs, and one policy which appeared to request they would not be worn. Conclusions This project highlights significant disparities in EDI policies within hospital theatre teams, especially regarding religious headwear. The lack of specific accommodations for religious garments creates an exclusionary environment. This can lead to increased stress and lower sense of belonging amongst minority staff. The findings emphasise the need for hospitals to re-evaluate and reform their policies, those with poor practices have been contacted. We aim to foster a more inclusive, equitable workplace.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.