Abstract

Abstract Direct-reading, time-resolved devices, such as optical particle counters (OPCs) and photometers, offer a unique insight into the temporal and spatial distribution of airborne particles. They can provide a comprehensive picture of changes in concentration of airborne particles in occupational settings and therefore can be used to investigate failures in engineering control systems as well as identify exposures driven by working procedures and methods. In recent years, new developments have led to the commercialisation of low- cost optical-based sensors, which provide particle matter (PM) mass concentrations including PM2.5 and PM10 for environmental monitoring. TNO, NIOSH, and HSE are investigating their application to occupational settings with the aim to produce guidelines for calibration and use. This study evaluated the performance and accuracy of six commercially available low-cost sensors (Airbeam 2, Airveda, Omni Awair, OPC-N3, OPC-R1 and PATS+), in calm air test chambers, against reference devices including an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS 3320), GK2.69 respirable cyclones, and pDR-1500 photometers. Several factors were considered: type of dust (particles having different size distribution, shape and refractive index), within- and between-device variations and exposure pattern (peak and constant concentrations). The devices were subjected to relatively high respirable concentrations (greater than 1 mg/m3) in addition to low concentrations. This presentation will present the results of the laboratory testing with particular focus on their accuracy, response, and calibration for quantitative exposure measurements. The low-cost sensor devices are also being deployed in the workplace for further evaluation and practicality of use.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call