Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Brain metastases (BM) occur in 30 to 50% of metastatic breast cancers (MBC) overexpressing HER2. In case of diffuse BM, current treatment is primarily based on whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Few systemic options are available. Lapatinib (L) has shown some activity in association with capecitabine (C) after previous WBRT. The LANDSCAPE study assessed the efficacy of the association before any local treatment. Methods Eligible pts had HER2+ MBC with BM not previously treated with WBRT, C or L. They received lapatinib 1,250 mg once daily and oral capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2 from day 1 to day 14, every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the rate of central nervous system objective responses (CNS-OR) defined as a ≥50% volumetric reduction of CNS lesions in the absence of all the following: increasing steroid use, progressive neurologic symptoms, or progressive extra-CNS disease. Secondary endpoints included time to progression (TTP), time to WBRT, and toxicity. Findings From April 2009 to August 2010, forty-five patients were included in the study. 44 patients were evaluable for efficacy, with a median follow-up of 21.2 months (range 2.2-27.6).The CNS-OR rate was 67.4% (95% CI: 51.5%-80.9%). Thirty-seven patients (86%) exhibited a reduction in tumor volume. Median time to progression was 5.5 months (95% CI: 4.3-6). At the time of analysis, 81.8% of patients had received brain radiotherapy, median time to radiotherapy was 8.3 months (95% CI: 5.4-9.1). Most adverse events (AE) were grade 1-2 as already reported for this association, 22 patients (49%) experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment related toxicity and 14 patients presented at least one SAE; treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 4 pts Interpretation The association of L and C is effective in the treatment of BM of HER2 positive BC. Our data suggest that this regimen might be used right away at diagnosis of BM. This approach might change the management of selected patients with BM, allowing a delayed WBRT. This strategy deserves further evaluation to confirm the clinical benefits for patients in terms of survival, cognitive functions and quality of life. We are currently planning such a randomized clinical trial. Disclosure T. Bachelot: GSK: Board member Travel accommodation Reaserch grant, M. Campone: GSK: Board Member, V. Dieras: GSK: Board Member. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.