Abstract

Abstract Controlling inbreeding within a population is critical to maintain additive genetic variance and reduce negative consequences such as inbreeding depression in small, closed herds. Some breeding programs may utilize subjective standard operating procedures (SOPs) such as setting the minimum number of boars, limiting the number of matings per boar, and limiting the relationships among active boars. Software programs such as Matesel can control inbreeding within a population more precisely using evolutionary algorithms by optimizing the mating and selection process to constrain inbreeding at a given target degree or other metric specified (e.g., coancestry). The main problem has been the choice of what relationship matrix to use in constraining inbreeding in these programs. Furthermore, there are many different genomic inbreeding metrics that can be used to quantify inbreeding rates over time. The objective of the current research was to investigate the trends in the pedigree [PED, (A diagonal – 1) * 100] and two population-based genomic inbreeding metrics. One based on expected homozygosity (2pq, Ghom) and one based on drift (squared allele frequency changes, Gdrift). Data included nucleus animals born from 2017 through 2022 from five different genetic lines (lines A-E). Most parents and male selection candidates were genotyped using the commercial 50k SNP panel from GeneSeek. Pedigree was traced back at least 3 generations. A total of 80k animals were sampled from the total number of genotyped animals for computational reasons across line and birth year. Results show that in general, the maternal lines (A and B) showed the least rate of inbreeding over time (0.30 and 0.43% / year for A and B, respectively), while terminal lines were greater, especially line D (0.36 to 0.76% / year). Pedigree inbreeding in 2022 was between 1.48% (line A) to 3.80% (line D) after subtracting the average pedigree inbreeding in 2017. Population-based genomic measures of inbreeding showed a very small difference in line A (0.09%), larger Gdrift than Ghom in line B (1.37%), and larger Ghom than Gdrift in lines C, D, and E (2.87% to 4.38%). In general, the trend for PED and Gdrift was very similar for all lines, while Ghom tended to increase rapidly out of control in the three terminal lines (C-E) in later years. Future research will focus on integrating results from the diagonals of a variety of G matrices on an individual basis (e.g., VanRaden 1 and 2, runs-of-homozygosity, and a linkage-analysis matrix). Results showed the pedigree and genomic drift trends over time were similar, however, the genomic homozygosity trend was much greater in terminal lines.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call