(119) Impact of Ethnicity on Clinical Outcomes of Intralesional CCH in Peyronie's Disease Patients Across Kaiser Permanente Southern California Database

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Intralesional CCH injection is an effective treatment for Peyronie’s disease (PD) that utilizes collagenolytic enzymes to break down collagen plaque, thus reducing the penile deformity. The IMPRESS I and II clinical trials demonstrated efficacy of CCH in a predominant Caucasian population of men (95.8%). Little is known about treatment efficacy in the non-Caucasian population. Objective Using Kaiser Permanente’s ethnically diverse database, we sought to study the impact of race on CCH treatment outcomes. Methods This study examined the efficacy of intralesional CCH injection in a large healthcare system over 15 years. We defined treatment efficacy as percent change in penile curvature abnormality from baseline after a maximum of 4 treatment cycles. Impact of comorbidities on CCH efficacy was also examined. Patients with ventral curvature or initial curvature <30 ̊ or >90 ̊ were excluded from analysis. Standard statistical analysis was performed. Results 112 patients underwent CCH therapy and were included in this analysis. 46.4% of men completed all 4 cycles. Among men who received CCH, 66.1% were Caucasian, 22.3% Hispanic, and 9.8% African American. For co-morbidities, 87.5.% of men were not diabetic, while 22.3% of men had erectile dysfunction. The mean baseline pre-injection penile curvature was 51.63 degrees (range was 32-87 degrees). Caucasian men had the largest treatment response to CCH (45.6% decrease in penile curvature) compared to African American men (43.7%) and Hispanic men (40.5%), p = 0.9554. Non-diabetic men had a larger treatment response to CCH (44.9% decrease in curvature versus 39.3% in diabetics, p = 0.4726). Younger Men (age 18-44) also experienced a greater treatment response compared to other age groups (57.9% reduction in curvature, p = 0.171). There was a significant difference in number of cycles completed across different ethnicities (p = 0.0220). Hispanic men were significantly less likely to complete all 4 cycles of CCH compared to Caucasian and African American men (p=0.0004). Only 28.2% of Hispanic men completed all 4 treatment cycles. 48% of Hispanic patients report the need of language interpretation services during health appointments. Conclusions This is the largest post-market analysis of CCH treatment outcomes in a racially diverse PD population. Caucasian men had a greater treatment response after CCH injection possibly due to higher rate of completing all 4 treatment cycles. Nondiabetic men and younger men (aged 18 to 44) also had a greater treatment response after CCH injection. Hispanic men were significantly less likely to complete 4 cycles of injection therapy; possible explanations include language barriers. Future study is needed to determine if patient resources prepared in Spanish can improve treatment outcomes in Hispanic men with PD, and reduce these health care disparities observed in our study. Disclosure No.