Abstract

Abstract Background Dalbavancin is FDA-approved for skin and skin tissue infections (SSTI) and is an alternative therapy for deep-seated gram-positive infections when avoidance of long-term catheters or prolonged hospitalization for intravenous (IV) antibiotics is desired. This observational, retrospective study evaluated the utilization of dalbavancin at a large academic medical center between May 1, 2021, and November 30, 2021. The objectives were to analyze the patient characteristics, clinical outcomes (including treatment adherence), and economic impact by looking at the estimated length of stay (LOS) and cost avoidance associated with dalbavancin use. Methods Variables of interest were analyzed with descriptive statistics. A chi-square test was used to assess the relationship between no-shows and infection-related readmissions. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict factors associated with treatment nonadherence. Results We examined 96 cases consisting of 34 patients with IV drug use (35.4%), 47 with non-IV substance use (49.0%), and 22 with homelessness (24.0%). The most common indication for use was non-vertebral osteomyelitis (34.4%, n=33), followed by SSTI (16.7%, n=16) and endocarditis (14.6%, n=14) (Table 1). Treatment adherence was found to be 84.4% (n=81), and readmissions and adverse reactions were rare (Table 2). The average LOS avoided was 28 days (SD, 13.6). The average cost avoided was $56,000 US dollars (SD, $27,180.63). No-shows were not associated with infection-related readmissions (p =.99). In our multivariate analysis, those with non-IV substance use were significantly less likely to attend their scheduled infusion (p=.003), and those with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were significantly more likely to attend their infusion (p=.013) (Table 3). Conclusion Dalbavancin was a safe and economically beneficial alternative for deep-seated infections. Readmissions and adverse reactions were uncommon, and there were no documented deaths within 90 days of discharge. Treatment adherence was high. Those with non-IV substance use and possibly homelessness may be at higher risk for nonadherence, but treatment nonadherence did not lead to poorer outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.