(117) Interrater Agreement and Feasibility of Three-Dimensional Photography for Curvature Assessment in Peyronie's Disease

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Curvature assessment is an iterative aspect of the evaluation of Peyronie’s Disease (PD); its accuracy is subject to patient erection quality and clinician technique. Prior studies have shown promising results when using 3D modeling software in curvature assessment, yet none have applied the technology to human subjects with complex PD in an authentic clinical scenario. Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using 3D modeling to assess penile deformity in PD patients. Methods MirrorMe3D is a HIPPA-compliant iOS mobile and web-based platform designed for 3D anatomical modeling. 2 trained urology fellows (coders 1 and 2) were trained to create models using the app by acquiring ≥ 12 images of the target obtained in a multiplanar, 360-degree fashion. Participants verbally consented to deidentified penile photography during their clinic visit for penile curvature assessment with Doppler ultrasound (CADUS). Photographs were obtained prior to performing DUS with the patient in the supine position and using a commercially available clip-on ring light and custom 3D-printed holder device placed over the penis base for stabilization. 3D models were generated upon completion of the visit and screened for quality. Curvature assessment on the 3D images included curvature direction, location, degrees, and other defects identified via visual inspection of the digital model. Results 7 unique, quality 3D images were generated using 15-20 photos per participant (Figure 1). The time required to obtain images was 1-2 minutes. Once the 3D image was developed, the curvature assessment took about 5 minutes. Quantitative results are summarized in Table 1. We observed a high rate of agreement in terms of primary direction of curvature and an acceptable variance rate when evaluating degrees of curvature within a margin of 10°; of note, coders were in agreement with each other to within a 10° margin 100% of the time (7/7 patients). We also observed a high agreement rate when evaluating the presence of absence of tapering but low agreement when assessing for the presence of indentation and hourglass deformity. Regarding the penis stabilizer, our experience suggests that it may alter the base of the penis anatomy, but it improves capture of the organ with diminished interference from surrounding anatomy (scrotum, abdomen). Factors influencing the quality of the image were exam room set-up, patient anxiety about losing an erection, lighting, and body hair. Conclusions 3D image-based PD assessment can be implemented with minimal impact to visit efficiency. The 3D technique does not appear to reproduce complex PD measurements obtained by CADUS; however, future studies will evaluate the utility of employing this technology to a larger cohort and also to monitor treatment effect in complex PD patients. Disclosure No.