Abstract

BackgroundCatheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) account for nearly 30% of all hospital-acquired infections. From 2009 to 2013, the frequency of CAUTIs increased by 6% with associated increases in length of stay, antibiotic usage and mortality (2.3%); they are also a risk factor for secondary bloodstream infections. In 2017, the CAUTI SIR for the UTSW University hospitals was 0.990 for Clements University Hospital (CUH) and 1.224 for Zale-Lipshy (ZL), placing UTSW above the 50th percentile compared with similar academic medical centers. By the end of 2018, the aim of the quality improvement project was to reduce CAUTIs by 25% or improve the SIR to 0.78, which is at or below the 50th percentile.MethodsBaseline data included identifying indications and duration of catheter placement as well as performing debriefings on all CAUTIs along with analysis of adherence to the CAUTI bundle. Using evidence-based guidelines, the three primary interventions were (1) streamlining indications for insertion, (2) ensuring prompt removal and (3) providing alternative care pathways after removal. We observed insertion technique and catheter care; nursing services were engaged to understand barriers to catheter removal and subsequently informed of other options such as in-and-out protocols, bladder scanners and female external catheters. Nursing leadership also performed daily necessity audits of all patients with indwelling catheters.ResultsUrine output monitoring in acute/critical illness and urinary obstruction/retention were the top two indications for use. Catheter utilization rates have decreased since 2016. The average dwell time at CUH was 51 hours (excl. urology) and 40 hours at ZL. There was actually a 34% decrease in the total number of CAUTIs from 38 in 2017 to 25 in 2018, exceeding the goal of 25% reduction; the 2018 SIR for CUH was 0.818 and 0.496 for ZL. The prevention of 13 CAUTI events from 2017 to 2018 resulted in ~$180,000 savings.ConclusionSuccessful reduction of CAUTI is an interdisciplinary effort requiring consistent attention and support from infection prevention, nursing, education, quality improvement, IT and hospital administration. Empowering nursing staff, providing clear protocols post-removal and options for alternative external urinary devices is key. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call