Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologySexual Function/Dysfunction/Andrology: Evaluation I1 Apr 20121140 ASSESSMENT OF INTRAVAGINAL EJACULATORY TIME IN LIFELONG PREMATURE EJACULATION PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT MONOSYMPTOMATIC ENURESIS Hakan Koyuncu, Ege Can Serefoglu, Safak Karacay, Ahmet Tunc Ozdemir, and Faruk Yencilek Hakan KoyuncuHakan Koyuncu Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author , Ege Can SerefogluEge Can Serefoglu New Orleans, LA More articles by this author , Safak KaracaySafak Karacay Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author , Ahmet Tunc OzdemirAhmet Tunc Ozdemir Ankara, Turkey More articles by this author , and Faruk YencilekFaruk Yencilek Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.1250AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Recent clinical studies reported an association between monosymptomatic enuresis (ME) and lifelong premature ejaculation (PE). The purpose of this study is to compare the intravaginal ejaculatory times (IELT) in lifelong PE patients with and without ME. METHODS Between November 2008 and March 2011, a total of 137 patients with lifelong PE were admitted to our outpatient clinic. Patients were asked if they had ME in their childhood and their age of urinary continence (AUC) was recorded. The characteristics and mean IELTs of PE patients with and without ME were compared with Mann-Whitney U test. Moreover, the correlation between AUC and IELT of patients with and without ME was assessed with Spearman linear correlation test. RESULTS Of the patients, 57 (41.6%) reported ME. There was no significant difference in terms of age (36.0±7.8y vs. 34.1±8.3y, p=0.096) or mean IELT (45.2±17.4s vs. 47.5±17.6s, p=0.504) between patients with and without ME. Of the patients with ME, 16 (28.1%) had infrequent, 18 (31.6%) had moderate and 23 (40.3%) had severe ME and there was no statistically significant relation between the severity of ME and mean IELTs. AUCs of patients with and without ME were 7.9±1.3 and 3.4±0.5, respectively. In patients with ME, IELT had a fair positive linear correlation with AUC (rho=0.238, p= 0.074, figure 1), whereas very weak linear correlation between IELT and AUC was observed among patients without ME (rho= 0.027, p= 0.811) and no correlation was detected in the entire group (rho=0.005, p= 0.956). CONCLUSIONS ME seems to be more prevalent among men with lifelong PE. Positive linear correlation between IELT and AUC in patient with ME may suggest a common underlying mechanism. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings and elucidate the exact pathophysiology. Table 1. The characteristics of lifelong PE patients with and without ME with ME without ME Number 57 80 Age (mean ± SD) 36.0±7.8 34.1±8.3 IELTs (seconds) 45.2±17.4 47.5±17.6 AUC (mean±SD) 7.9±1.3 3.4±0.5 Number of infrequent ME 16 (28%) - Number of moderate ME 18 (31%) - Number severe ME 23 (40%) - PE: Premature Ejaculation, ME: Monosymptomatic Enuresis, IELT: Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time, AUC: Age of Urinary Incontinence © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e462 Peer Review Report Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Hakan Koyuncu Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author Ege Can Serefoglu New Orleans, LA More articles by this author Safak Karacay Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author Ahmet Tunc Ozdemir Ankara, Turkey More articles by this author Faruk Yencilek Istanbul, Turkey More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.