112 Comparing Various Size Fractions Collected Using Dusttrak And Gravimetric Samples

Abstract

Abstract Occupational exposure concentrations are routinely collected using gravimetric samples. However, gravimetric samples typically require a long sampling time, especially when there are low exposure concentrations. While long sampling time may be appropriate to verify compliance with 8-h occupational limit values (OELs), they cannot address exposure's temporal and spatial heterogeneity or provide information on peak exposures present in the work environment. Real-time light scattering sensors enable the possibility of collecting high-resolution, low-cost measurements, quickly identifying peak and short-term concentrations, linking exposure to emission sources, and better understanding within-day variation. These technologies have become increasingly popular also for occupational monitoring purposes. In this presentation, the results of the dust samples collected for a randomized double-blinded controlled human exposure chamber study are presented. In six groups, 24 healthy volunteers were exposed to two common stone minerals, quartz diorite, and rhomb porphyry, in 4-h exposure sessions. To control the exposure in the chamber, personal gravimetric samples of respirable dust and stationary gravimetric samples of total dust, PM2.5, and respiratory dust were collected. Additionally, stationary real-time samples of total dust, respirable dust, PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 were collected continuously using DustTrak TSI model DRX 8533. Despite the many advantages of the real-time sensors, evaluating compliance with OELs should be done with caution. Except for the PM2.5 fraction, a significant difference was observed between the gravimetric and the DustTrak samples. While the DustTrak overestimated the PM2.5 concentrations, the total dust concatenations were underestimated by a factor of almost two compared to the gravimetric samples.