1073 Prone Transpsoas (PTP)-LLIF Approach Versus Standard LLIF in Patients Undergoing Surgical Revision Following Adult Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Both the prone transpsoas (PTP) and standard LLIF have been developed to facilitate minimally invasive (MIS) indirect decompression, alignment correction, and posterior instrumentation. METHODS: A multi-center cohort of all patients was identified and all relevant data were retrospectively collected. Preoperative standing 36” scoliosis radiographs were retrospectively reviewed for pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), and PI minus LL (PI-LL mismatch). Postoperative regional sagittal alignment parameters were measured using the first postoperative standing 36” scoliosis radiographs. Finally, multivariable analysis was performed to assess the primary outcome measure: postoperative change in regional sagittal alignment (PI-LL mismatch). RESULTS: Two-hundred and two (n = 202) patients were retrospectively identified and included for formal analysis. One-hundred and fifty one (n = 151, 74.8%) of the patients underwent PTP revision while 51 (25.2%) underwent standard LLIF revision. Univariate analysis demonstrated a greater value for baseline mean pre-operative PI-LL mismatch in the PTP versus standard LLIF cohort (21.4 vs. 10.45°; p = 0.0001). Furthermore, multiple linear regression demonstrated that the PTP approach enabled significantly greater PI-LL mismatch change (p = 0.0017) and that this change was associated with the number of levels fused (p = 0.0481) as well as percutaneous (vs. open) screw placement (p = 0.0193). Finally, multiple logistic regression identified standard LLIF (p = 0.0378), female sex (p < 0.0001), non-osteoporotic bone density (p < 0.0001), and younger age (p < 0.0001) as predictive of postoperative PI-LL mismatch < 10° (the threshold under which such mismatch is no longer regarded as clinically significant deformity). CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, PTP-LLIF was associated with greater net improvement in postoperative PI-LL mismatch, the primary outcome measure of this study. The present retrospective analysis therefore corroborated results of previous studies in suggesting that the utility of PTP-LLIF is translatable to ASD revision surgery.