Abstract
The issue of the work is an analysis of characteristics of land debt, known as non-accessory real right securing claims in German and Swiss law. Using the method of comparative analysis of the characteristics of this property right, author determines the similarities and differences of land debt in relation to similar types of rights, in particular in relation to a mortgage, as most similar security right, from the group of liens. Since the Draft Code of ownership and other property real rights in Serbia in 2006. proposed the introduction of real debt in Serbian law, the author of the paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of this concept in order to evaluate this assessment.. As an essential difference to the lien, the author defines the non-accessory character of land debt and multifunctional purpose. The author advocates the introduction of institute of land debt in future Serbian law, as the original non-accessory real security right (sui generis) that represents functional addittion to accessory mortgage.
Highlights
The issue of the work is an analysis of characteristics of land debt
The author advocates the introduction of institute of land debt
ɆȽɁ; „ɏɢɩɨɬɟɤɚ ʁɟ ɡɚɥɨɠɧɨ ɩɪɚɜɨ ɧɚ ɧɟɩɨɤɪɟɬɧɨɫɬɢ, ɤɨʁɟ ɨɜɥɚɲʄɭʁɟ ɩɨɜɟɪɢɨɰɚ ɞɚ, ɚɤɨ ɞɭɠɧɢɤ ɧɟ ɢɫɩɥɚɬɢ ɞɭɝ ɨ ɞɨɫɩɟɥɨɫɬɢ ɡɚɯɬɟɜɚ ɧɚɩɥɚɬɭ ɩɨɬɪɚɠɢɜɚʃɚ ɨɛɟɡɛɟɻɟɧɨɝ ɯɢɩɨɬɟɤɨɦ ɢɡ ɜɪɟɞɧɨɫɬɢ ɧɟɩɨɤɪɟɬɧɨɫɬɢ, ɩɪɟ ɨɛɢɱɧɢɯ ɩɨɜɟɪɢɥɚɰɚ ɢ ɩɪɟ ɞɨɰɧɢʁɢɯ ɯɢɩɨɬɟɤɚɪɧɢɯ ɩɨɜɟɪɢɥɚɰɚ, ɛɟɡ ɨɛɡɢɪɚ ɭ ɱɢʁɨʁ ɫɟ ɫɜɨʁɢɧɢ ɧɟɩɨɤɪɟɬɧɨɫɬ ɧɚɥɚɡɢ.“ ɑɥ
Summary
Ɋɚɠɟɬɚɤ: ɉɪɟɞɦɟɬ ɪɚɞɚ ɩɪɟɞɫɬɚɜʂɚ ɚɧɚɥɢɡɚ ɢɧɫɬɢɬɭɬɚ ɡɟɦʂɢɲɧɨɝ ɞɭɝɚ ɤɚɨ ɚɮɢɪɦɢɫɚɧɨɝ ɧɟɚɤɰɟɫɨɪɧɨɝ ɫɪɟɞɫɬɜɚ ɪɟɚɥɧɨɝ ɨɛɟɡɛɟɻɟʃɚ ɩɪɜɟɧɫɬɜɟɧɨ ɭ ɧɟɦɚɱɤɨʁ ɪɟɝɭɥɚɬɢɜɢ, ɤɚɨ ɢ ɭ ɲɜɚʁɰɚɪɫɤɨʁ, ɭ ɧɟɲɬɨ ɢɡɦɟʃɟɧɨʁ „ɤɨɧɫɬɪɭɤɰɢʁɢ“. Ɩɪɟɞɥɨɠɟɧɨ ɭɜɨɻɟʃɟ ɪɟɚɥɧɨɝ ɞɭɝɚ (ɡɟɦʂɢɲɧɨɝ ɞɭɝɚ) ɢ ɭ ɩɪɚɜɨ ɋɪɛɢʁɟ, ɚɭɬɨɪ ɭ ɪɚɞɭ ɫɚɝɥɟɞɚɜɚ ɩɪɟɞɧɨɫɬɢ ɢ ɧɟɞɨɫɬɚɬɤɟ ɨɜɨɝ ɢɧɫɬɢɬɭɬɚ, ɭ ɰɢʂɭ ɜɪɟɞɧɨɫɧɟ ɨɰɟɧɟ.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have