10 Years of Antenatal Hydronephrosis Experience: Comparing Two Different Guidelines

Abstract

Abstract Background Antenatal hydronephrosis refers to the dilation of the renal pelvis and/or calyces in the developing fetus. The challenge lies in distinguishing between cases that warrant long-term follow-up or surgical intervention and those with transient hydronephrosis that require minimal invasive investigations. Materials and Methods Our study aimed to assess and contrast the efficacy of the 2015 Congenital Anomalies of Kidney and Urinary Tract Guideline from the Turkish Society of Pediatric Nephrology with the Tepecik Antenatal Hydronephrosis Guideline, which was previously employed in our hospital. We conducted a comparative analysis of demographic data, outcome conditions, additional imaging requirements and quantities, radiation exposures, and rates of surgical interventions between two groups. Results Group 2 had a significantly higher detection rate of Vesicoureteral Reflux via voiding cystourethrogram at 38.5% compared to Group 1's 13.4% (p<0.01). The incidence of abnormal findings with dimercaptosuccinic acid was similar between Group 1 (28.5%) and Group 2 (26.4%) (p>0.01), but Group 2 had a higher rate of obstruction diagnosis at 68.8% versus Group 1's 29.4% (p<0.01). Group 1 had greater median radiation exposure (500 mrem vs. 200 mrem, p<0.01), and a higher proportion of patients underwent surgery (34.2% vs. 21.9%, p<0.01). Conclusion This study showed that the new guideline required fewer tests, was less invasive, and exposed patients to less radiation than the old guideline.