Abstract

In this article, the authors deal with certain legal aspects of home birth, in particular as recognised by the European Court of Human Rights and from the perspective of present Serbian legislation. The number of women giving birth at their homes is still significantly lower than those wishing to give birth at a hospital, both in Serbia and in Europe. Even with that in mind, the authors assert that the state does not have the right to deny a woman her right to choose the circumstances and the environment in which she will give birth. By doing that the state breaches the woman's right to privacy, right to personal autonomy and right to self-determination in respect of her own body, which are all founded in the constitutionally guaranteed inviolability of the human personality. That is why the authors believe the state is obliged to provide the legitimacy to the woman's choice of the place of her child's birth. Moreover, the state should take a step further and enable the woman with accessible and professional medical assistance (of a midwife) in case she wishes to give birth at her home. Further on, the research into Serbian legislation and practice conducted by the authors and presented in this article, demonstrates that even though current Serbian legislation on birth registration expressly provides for registration of birth outside of medical institutions, that its implementation is not uniform across the state, leading to discrimination of these parents and their children, at least in some areas of Serbia. Unequal treatment in relation to registration of births which occurred outside of hospitals can be attributed to several factors, among which, the registrars' desire to prevent undesirable situations such as obduction of children or false registration of birth certainly cannot be underestimated. However, as the authors point out, this must not be at the expence of parents who, by practicing their right to choose the place of childbirth, choose that their children be born at their homes. Because of that, the authors particularly stress the need for thorough analysis of legislation - both in the area of health protection and birth registration - so that clearer regulation would ensure realisation of the right to choose the place of childbirth which the European Court of Human Rights declared to be an element of the right to privacy guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Highlights

  • II.1. STAVOVI EVROPSKOG SUDA ZA LJUDSKA PRAVADržave članice Saveta Evrope na različite načine uređuju pravo žene da donese odluku o tome da li će se poroditi u kućnim uslovima uz prisustvo babice ili u bolnici.[13]

  • Pravo na porođaj kod kuće – izbor, a ne slučajnost – i neke pravne posledice određene osobenosti kada je u pitanju položaj babice u sistemu zdravstvene zaštite ili osiguranje od profesionalne odgovornosti babica.[43]

  • The authors deal with certain legal aspects of home birth, in particular as recognised by the European Court of Human Rights and from

Read more

Summary

II.1. STAVOVI EVROPSKOG SUDA ZA LJUDSKA PRAVA

Države članice Saveta Evrope na različite načine uređuju pravo žene da donese odluku o tome da li će se poroditi u kućnim uslovima uz prisustvo babice ili u bolnici.[13]. Utvrđujući okolnosti slučaja, Evropski sud je došao do saznanja da u Mađarskoj postoji jedna vrsta profesionalnog konsenzusa zdravstvenih radnika da je porođaj u kućnim uslovima manje bezbedan od porođaja u zdravstvenoj ustanovi, što se potkrepljuje i sa nekoliko slučajeva koji su se u Mađarskoj dogodili pre slučaja Ternovski protiv Mađarske, kada su porođaji u kućnim uslovima završili smrću beba ili pak ozbiljnim oštećenjima njihovog zdravlja.[20] Zbog ovakvog stava „struke” po pitanju porođaja. Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima i osnovnim slobodama (dalje: EKLJP), podnosilac predstavke pred Evropskim sudom gospođa Ternovski navela je da joj je bilo onemogućeno da dobije stručnu medicinsku pomoć prilikom porođaja kod kuće, jer važeće mađarsko zakonodavstvo ne poznaje mogućnost pružanja stručne medicinske pomoći porodiljama koje odluče da se porode kod kuće. Više o detaljima hapšenja i samom toku suđenja Agneš Gereb na http://www.szuleteshaz.hu/the-case-of-agnes-gereb-independent-midwife-with-the-hungariancourt/?lang=en, 01.02.2014

II.1.1.1. Ternovski protiv Mađarske – obrazloženje Suda
II.2. ULOGA BABICE PRILIKOM POROĐAJA U KUĆNIM USLOVIMA
II.2.1. Propisi zemalja EU koji regulišu ulogu babice prilikom porođaja u kući
II.2.1.1. Nemačka
II.2.1.2. Holandija
II.2.1.3. Francuska
II.2.1.4. Velika Britanija
II.2.1.5. Srbija
II.2.2. Odgovornost babice u slučaju nepravilnog pružanja usluga
II.2.3. Osiguranje od profesionalne odgovornosti babica
III.1. PRAVO NA REGISTRACIJU ROĐENJA
III.1.1. Diskriminacija prilikom registracije rođenja
III.2. RELEVANTNE ODREDBE DOMAĆIH PROPISA U VEZI S PRIJAVOM ROĐENJA
III.3. PRAKSA REGISTRACIJE ROĐENJA U SRBIJI
III.3.1. Postupanje matičnih službi
III.3.2. Iskustva roditelja
III.4. JESU LI BEBE ROĐENE KOD KUĆE I NJIHOVI RODITELJI U SRBIJI DISKRIMINISANI?
Munich Declaration
Nurses and midwives for health
SUMMARY
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call