CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs | VOL. 1
Read

10.1023/A:1010629003140

Publication Date Jan 1, 2000

Abstract

Those for and against hate crime laws debate each other in the shadow of John Stuart Mill. Both accept the Millian premise that the state is justified in coercing an individual only to prevent harm to others and not to condemn that individual for holding objectionable beliefs, values, or preferences.1 They purport to disagree only about what that principle the guiding tenet of modem liberalism entails. Because hate crime laws distinguish between otherwise identical assaults based solely on offenders' motives, the opponents of those laws see them as singling out hate criminals for additional punishment solely because of their noxious ideologies. The proponents of hate crime laws, in contrast, disclaim any interest in punishing offenders for their values and insist that such laws are warranted strictly by the greater harms that hate crimes inflict, both on their victims and on third parties. At that point, the debate usually turns empirical. Is the "greater harm"

Concepts

Hate Crime Laws Greater Harm Hate Crime Additional Punishment Crime Laws

Round-ups are the summaries of handpicked papers around trending topics published every week. These would enable you to scan through a collection of papers and decide if the paper is relevant to you before actually investing time into reading it.

Climate change Research Articles published between Nov 21, 2022 to Nov 27, 2022

R DiscoveryNov 28, 2022
R DiscoveryArticles Included:  2

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors. The conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretatio...

Read More

Coronavirus Pandemic

You can also read COVID related content on R COVID-19

R ProductsCOVID-19

ONE PROBLEM . ONE PURPOSE . ONE PLACE

Creating the world’s largest AI-driven & human-curated collection of research, news, expert recommendations and educational resources on COVID-19

COVID-19 Dashboard

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on “as is” basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The Copyright Law.