Abstract

The Wittenberg scholars confined themselves to extract certain astronomical data from Copernicus's work and to consider it a mere mathematical model that enabled them to render the celestial motions in a more accurate way. Westman called this phenomenon the 'Wittenberg Interpretation of the Copernican Theory'. Erasmus Reinhold and Philipp Melanchthon played a pivotal role in establishing this tradition. Adequate as the term 'Wittenberg Interpretation' is to describe the reception of Copernicus's theory in the second half of the sixteenth century, it contains a major shortcoming, as it is rather the description of an effect than of a cause. The question that must be raised is why the Wittenberg astronomers and natural philosophers were so reluctant to discuss Copernicus's cosmological and physical theses. The thesis is the decline of the medieval culture of disputation that prevented vivid discussion of Copernicus's cosmological theses within university circles. Keywords: Copernican Theory; Erasmus Reinhold; medieval disputation culture; Philipp Melanchthon; Wittenberg

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.