Abstract
We systematically study 4D mathcal{N} = 2 superconformal field theories (SCFTs) that can be constructed via type IIB string theory on isolated hypersurface singularities (IHSs) embedded in ℂ4. We show that if a theory in this class has no mathcal{N} = 2-preserving exactly marginal deformation (i.e., the theory is isolated as an mathcal{N} = 2 SCFT), then it has no 1-form symmetry. This situation is somewhat reminiscent of 1-form symmetry and decomposition in 2D quantum field theory. Moreover, our result suggests that, for theories arising from IHSs, 1-form symmetries originate from gauge groups (with vanishing beta functions). One corollary of our discussion is that there is no 1-form symmetry in IHS theories that have all Coulomb branch chiral ring generators of scaling dimension less than two. In terms of the a and c central charges, this condition implies that IHS theories satisfying a<frac{1}{24}left(15r+2fright) and c<frac{1}{6}left(3r+fright) (where r is the complex dimension of the Coulomb branch, and f is the rank of the continuous 0-form flavor symmetry) have no 1-form symmetry. After reviewing the 1-form symmetries of other classes of theories, we are motivated to conjecture that general interacting 4D mathcal{N} = 2 SCFTs with all Coulomb branch chiral ring generators of dimension less than two have no 1-form symmetry.
Highlights
We show that if a theory in this class has no N = 2-preserving exactly marginal deformation, it has no 1-form symmetry
In order to gain an additional handle on the space of 4D N = 2 superconformal field theories (SCFTs), it is useful to understand whether these conformal gauge groups are the only sources of 1-form symmetries
We have argued that 4D N = 2 SCFTs arising from type IIB string theory on isolated hypersurface singularities (IHSs) have 1-form symmetry only if they have an exactly marginal deformation
Summary
Our main claim is true in these theories (as discussed above, this statement is somewhat trivial given the fact that all (Ap−1, Aq−1) SCFTs have no 1-form symmetry, even if they are not isolated). We discuss certain facts about 1-form symmetries in a subclass of type I IHS theories with exactly marginal deformations and relate these results to ones discussed in [24, 26, 51, 52] In the appendix we consider the remaining IHS theories discussed in [26, 28, 29] and complete the general proof of our main claim
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.