Abstract
This chapter deals with the issue of the degree to which the facts of art theft, in particular the time it can take for the discovery and resolution of the theft, correspond to the time limitations found in the law when a victim attempts to recover that art. A consistent theme that runs through the various cases is that the time between a theft and any possible discovery and action by the victim of that theft. There are two major observations that can be made on the basis of what has been reviewed here. First, the accumulating data on art thefts indicates without question that often thefts of art are not solved within the common time limitations set in civil laws of many countries, especially those such as Australia that have a six-year limit. Second, a glaring oversight in social policy has emerged in countries such as Australia. Keywords: art theft; Australia; civil laws; social policy
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.