Abstract
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has enabled a comprehensive exploration of materials for various applications. However, AI models often prioritize frequently encountered material examples in the scientific literature, limiting the selection of suitable candidates based on inherent physical and chemical attributes. To address this imbalance, we generated a dataset consisting of 1,453,493 natural language-material narratives from OQMD, Materials Project, JARVIS, and AFLOW2 databases based on ab initio calculation results that are more evenly distributed across the periodic table. The generated text narratives were then scored by both human experts and GPT-4, based on three rubrics: technical accuracy, language and structure, and relevance and depth of content, showing similar scores but with human-scored depth of content being the most lagging. The integration of multimodal data sources and large language models holds immense potential for AI frameworks to aid the exploration and discovery of solid-state materials for specific applications of interest.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
