Abstract

This study sought to study the second-generation everolimuseluting stent (EES) as compared with first-generation sirolimus-eluting (SES) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. All DM patients treated with EES or SES from January 2010, to December 2011 were included. The EES was compared with SES for the primary composite endpoint of clinically driven detected restenosis, definite stent thrombosis (ST), and all-cause mortality. In 226 percutaneous coronary intervention-treated DM patients, 353 stents were implanted (EES 118, SES 235). The EES was associated with significantly lower restenosis rates compared with SES (SES vs. EES: 16.7% vs. 2.8%, p=0,001, OR: 2.96; 95% CI: 1.57 to 5.57). Lower incidence of ST (SES vs. EES: 2,1% vs 0,8%, p=0,38) and mortality (SES vs. EES: 1,7 % vs 0%, p=0,15) was noted but did not reach statistical significance. In all-comer DM patients the use of EES was associated with improved outcomes compared with SES mainly driven by lower rates of clinically driven detected restenosis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.