025 Benefit of Drug Eluting Stents over Bare Metal Stents after Rotational Atherectomy. A propensity score adjusted comparison in revascularization, mortality and MACE

Abstract

Rotational atherectomy makes possible to attempt small and calcified arteries while Drug Eluting Stents (DES) properties may reduce the restenosis process, rendering this combination attractive in selected cases. We compared 1year clinical outcome after rotational atherectomy following by either DES or Bare Metal Stents (BMS) implantation. Single centre registry including all consecutive cases of rotational atherectomy use. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients. Propensity score for being treated with a DES was calculated using 18 clinical, angiographic and procedural variables. Comparison was adjusted on 4 strata of the propensity score. Between 2002 and 2008, 223 patients were treated: 114 with BMS and 110 with DES. Most of the patients with BMS between 2002 and 2004 and later with DES. No significant difference was observed in clinical characteristics between groups: age 70 years, reference diameter 2.40±0.60mm, lesion length 10±9mm. Two cases of coronary perforation occurred, 7 lesion failure, and 12 transcient no-reflow. The use of GP2b3a inhibitors was similar in both groups, but, compared with BMS, patients in the DES group had longer duration of combination of aspirin and Clopidogrel. At one year, significantly lower rates of vessel revascularisation (2% vs 12%, p=0.005), of all cause mortality (5% vs 14%, p=0.05) and of MACE (10% vs 22%, p=0.02) were observed in the DES than in the BMS group. Adjustment on the strata of the propensity score did not change significantly these results (figure). Despite propensity score adjusted, this comparison has limitations. After rotational atherectomy we observed clear benefit for DES implantation over BMS on vessel revascularisation, mortality and MACE rates.