Abstract

Abstract Introduction Few studies have examined the associations between daily sleep and daytime functioning in adolescents during naturalistically-occurring constrained (school term) and unconstrained (vacation) sleep opportunities. Methods Adolescents (n = 205; 54.1% females, age M ± SD = 16.9 ± 0.87 years) completed daily measures of sleep and daytime functioning over 28 continuous days (2-week school, and the subsequent 2-week vacation). Total sleep time (TST) and sleep efficiency (SE) were measured using actigraphy and sleep diary. Participants self-reported sleepiness and fatigue every morning and afternoon, and completed the brief, 3.2-minute psychomotor vigilance task (PVT; Joggle Research) on an iPad every afternoon. Using cross-lagged multilevel models, daily TST and SE were examined as predictors of next-day sleepiness, fatigue, and PVT performance. The associations did not differ between school and vacation. The non-significant interaction terms were dropped, and school/vacation status was maintained as a covariate. Previous-day outcome, day of the week, study day, school/vacation and sociodemographics were adjusted. Between-person associations (differences between individuals) and within-person associations (daily deviations from individual’s own mean capturing whether nights with longer- or better-than-average TST or SE respectively, relative to the individual’s average TST/SE, predict next-day outcomes) were tested simultaneously. Results Adolescents performed better on the PVT (faster reaction time and fewer lapses) following nights with longer-than-average TST (actigraphy and diary, p-values ≤ .044). Longer-than-average TST (actigraphy and diary) and higher diary SE also predicted lower self-reported sleepiness the next day (morning and afternoon, p-values ≤ .002). Similarly, longer-than-average TST and higher-than-average SE predicted lower self-reported fatigue the next day (morning and afternoon, all p-values ≤ .032). Compared to the vacation, school term was associated with higher self-reported fatigue in the morning and afternoon (p-values ≤ .014), but not higher sleepiness or poorer PVT performance. Conclusion Fluctuations in daily sleep were associated with adolescents’ next-day functioning. Importantly, longer- and better-than-average sleep consistently predicted better daytime functioning the next day. Findings were consistent across objective sustained attention and self-reported sleepiness and fatigue, highlighting the short-term effects of sleep restriction on adolescents’ daytime functioning. Protecting adolescents’ sleep duration and promoting good quality sleep on a daily basis could support optimal daytime functioning. Support (If Any) Dr Shen was supported by the Monash International Postgraduate Research Scholarship and Monash Graduate Scholarship.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call