(018) Predictors of the Conduct of Nerve Sparing During Radical Prostatectomy

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The association between nerve-sparing (NS) status at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) and functional outcomes is well described; however, our profession lacks insight as to whether patient factors such as age and baseline erectile function influence surgeon behavior when it comes to nerve-sparing during RP. Objective We analyzed predictors associated with bilateral nerve damage/resection at the time of RP. Methods The study included patients who underwent RP with surgeon-reported NS scoring. The NS outcome of the right and left sides were independently scored between 1-4: 1 = completely preserved, 2 = partially preserved, 3 = partially damaged, and 4 = completely resected; scores of 1 or 2 indicate nerve-sparing and scores of 3 or 4 indicate non-nerve-sparing. We classified overall NS status as bilateral, unilateral, or not-spared. Demographics, ED-related comorbidities, pre-RP digital rectal exam (DRE), most recent prostate biopsy (bx) results, and pre-RP IIEF Erectile Function Domain (EFD) were analyzed. Pre-RP prostate MRI was used to define prostate volume (PV). EFD score < 24 defined non-functional erections. We created a multivariable (MV) model to define predictors of poorer NS status. The model included patient age, pre-RP EFD, PV, PSA, DRE, noted possible extracapsular extension (ECE) on pre-RP MRI, number of positive bx cores, and predominant Gleason (G) score on bx. Results 3805 men met inclusion criteria. Median age was 64 (57, 67) years. Median pre-RP EFD score was 26 (15, 30); 41% had a pre-RP EFD score < 24. Median PV and PSA were 35 (27, 47) mL and 5.7 (4.2, 8.4) ng/dL, respectively. 64% had a normal pre-RP DRE. Median total bx cores 12 (9, 14). Median positive bx cores 4 (2, 7). Distribution of bx pathology: 17% G6, 64% G7, 10% G8, 8% G9, <1% G10. 65% had predominant G3 and 34% G4 pathology. 26% of MRI reports noted some degree of suspicion for ECE. NS status at RP: bilateral (69%), unilateral (20%), non-spared (11%). Median NS score was 3 (2, 4). On MV analysis, abnormal DRE, number of positive bx cores, and predominance of G4 were predictive of non-NS surgery. Most notably, the non-oncological factors – older patient age and a pre-RP EFD < 24 – were also predictive of non-NS surgery (Table). Conclusions While patient age and baseline erectile function (EF) are not necessarily predictors of a patient’s interest in preserving EF, these non-oncologic factors were identified as predictors of non-NS surgery in this analysis. Surgeons should define the individual patient’s sexual function goals prior to RP. Disclosure No.