Abstract

IntroductionIn adults, there is strong evidence demonstrating the superiority of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) plus intravenous thrombolysis over thrombolysis alone for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). The role of MT in the paediatric stroke population is less clear. Here we present an updated systematic review addressing the use of MT in paediatric patients, including three cases from our centre in Sydney, Australia. We have also completed an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of clinical and angiographic outcomes based on these results.MethodOur systematic review and IPD meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA-IPD (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Individual Participant Data) guidelines. Primary outcomes measures were change in NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) score following MT, and mRS (modified Rankin Scale) score at final reported follow-up. The secondary outcome measure was final angiographic result using the mTICI (modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia) scale.ResultsMT resulted in good long-term neurological outcomes (mRS 0–2) in 60/67 cases (89.6%;follow-up timing µ=4.1 months: 95%CI 2.9–5.3), good short-term neurological outcomes (reduction in NIHSS by 8 or more points or post-MT NIHSS of 0–1) in 37/52 cases (71.2%), and successful recanalization (mTICI 2b/3) in 57/67 cases (85.1%).ConclusionsIn paediatric patients, MT is an effective treatment for ischaemic stroke due to LVO. In the absence of a dedicated prospective registry and with randomized control trails unfeasible, this report represents the best available evidence for the use of MT in the paediatric setting.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call