Abstract
Background Interprofessional learning (IPL) can improve attitudes and awareness of other professionals’ roles and may improve patient outcomes. Simulation is increasingly used for IPL and specific learning outcomes have been developed. This study aimed to measure undergraduates’ attitudes to IPL, before and after, and team performance during, interprofessional simulation sessions. Methodology Final year students (50 medical, 47 nursing), in groups of 7 to 12, completed the KidSIM ATTITUDES tool1 before and after participating in a simulation session. Groups were divided into two mixed (medical/nursing) teams. One team undertook a 20 min scenario while the second team observed and scored their performance using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM).2 These roles were reversed for the second scenario. Reliability of both instruments was assessed by Cronbach’s Alpha. We assessed pre-post changes in ATTITUDES scores using paired-sample tests. The association of student demographic factors with ATTITUDES score changes and TEAM ratings was investigated using ANOVA. Results The ATTITUDES scale showed good reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.92). Total ATTITUDES scores showed a significant pre-post increase (paired t-test, p = 0.020) as did 25 of the 30 items (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p < 0.05). Total score increase was greater for those without prior team based learning experience (p = 0.011) and for White and Asian students (p = 0.007, p = 0.003) but did not vary with students’ course, gender, prior IPL experience or session attended. Reliability of the TEAM score within small-group scenarios was moderate to good (Cronbach’s α = 0.57–0.92). TEAM global score was unrelated to students’ course, gender, ethnicity and age but was significantly lower in the first of the two scenarios (p = 0.001). Conclusions and recommendations Simulation-based interprofessional education improved attitudes to IPL in final year nursing and medical students. Observing and rating peers may improve students’ teamwork skills. Funded through a Collaborative Teaching Development Grant awarded by the Higher Education Academy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.