Abstract
ABSTRACT: Previous studies have established that there is no definitive correlation for all curve types between the progression of a scoliosis and changes in body asymmetry but for many patients the motivation in seeking treatment is the improvement of their appearance rather than to correct an underlying skeletal deformity. Cosmetic concerns, quality of life and the psychosocial impacts of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis remain important factors in any clinical decision-making process. In conjunction with conventional radiologically derived measures, the addition of validated body asymmetry metrics should be included when designing patient specific treatment plans and assessing outcomes. Consolidating radiological diagnoses (Cobb angle, curve type) and clinical assessment data from groups of patients has additional value in the longitudinal assessment of the relative efficacy of differing clinical interventions within physical medicine.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
