Abstract

18th-century satirical magazines laid the foundations of the essay as a genre in the modern sense of the word. They formed a paradigm of essay in its various forms. The paper presents a typology of essays in satirical magazines. There are considered such magazines as Vsyakaya vsyachina (All Sorts of Things) edited by Catherine II, I to i se (This and That) and Parnasskiy shchepetil’nik (The Parnassian Vendor) by Mikhail Chulkov, Truten’ (The Drone), Pustomelya (The Tattler), Zhivopisets (The Painter) and Koshelek (The Purse) by Nikolai Novikov, Rasskazchik zabavnykh basen (The Teller of Amusing Stories) by Aleksandr Ablesimov etc. Essays are divided into three classes: in the first one, reflection and description form the structural basis of the text; the second is organized by narration; the third one combines the features of the first two. The classes are further subdivided into types according to the role of the editor as a fictitious persona being the primary subject of speech in the magazine. The first type of all classes is formed by essays that focus attention on the editor; articles where the editor plays a secondary role fall within the second type. In class I, type 1 is formed by essays characterizing the editor, while those in which other topics prevail fall under type 2. In class II, essays in which the editor takes part in the plot form type 1, while those where they do not fall into type 2. In class III, type 1 is characterized by the editor’s hegemony throughout the whole text, while in type 2 the editor’s position may change from part to part of the essay. The classification also takes into account such devices as dialogue and frame. Essays involving fantasy elements are specially marked. The editor’s persona makes essays in satirical magazines unique among all versions of the genre. It unites all the articles in a single magazine. This gives the magazine integrity, making it a continuum. Thus, essays become part of a complex literary unity.

Highlights

  • Лев Аркадьевич Трахтенберг д. филол. н., доцент кафедры истории русской литературы Московский государственный университет им.

  • В статье предлагается типология эссе в сатирических журналах на материале таких изданий, как «Всякая всячина» Екатерины II, «И то и сё» и «Парнасский щепетильник» М.

  • Первый тип во всех классах составляют эссе, в которых образ издателя находится в фокусе внимания; ко второму типу отнесены статьи, где издателю отводится второстепенная роль.

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Лев Аркадьевич Трахтенберг д. филол. н., доцент кафедры истории русской литературы Московский государственный университет им. В статье предлагается типология эссе в сатирических журналах на материале таких изданий, как «Всякая всячина» Екатерины II, «И то и сё» и «Парнасский щепетильник» М. Первый тип во всех классах составляют эссе, в которых образ издателя находится в фокусе внимания; ко второму типу отнесены статьи, где издателю отводится второстепенная роль.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.