Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to investigate the current status and perceptions of the ‘<Artificial Intelligence Mathematics>’ curriculum, providing insights for the effective implementation of the curriculum in real-world settings and offering guidance for ongoing education for practicing teachers. Methods Based on a literature review, the research subjects were selected, and survey questions were developed through preliminary research and expert reviews. A total of 34 survey responses, excluding those with missing data, were analyzed using frequency analysis and independent sample t-tests. Interviews were conducted with two survey respondents, and relevant excerpts were extracted to supplement the analysis of survey results. Results Most teachers actively utilize engineering tools in their <Artificial Intelligence Mathematics> classes, but difficulties have been observed in the preparation and implementation of lessons involving the use of these tools. Teachers identified professional development and a conducive environment for using engineering tools as the most crucial support needed. Desired professional development topics included specific teaching and learning methods, effective utilization of engineering tools, principles of artificial intelligence, and the integration of artificial intelligence with mathematics. The perception of essential prerequisite courses was highest for <Mathematics> and <Mathematics II>. Conclusions Teachers express the need for enhanced support in professional development, particularly focusing on specific teaching and learning methods, the utilization of engineering tools, the principles of artificial intelligence, and the integration of artificial intelligence with mathematics as training topics. It appears necessary to strengthen support for workshops covering these areas. Improvement in the learning environment for utilizing engineering tools in classes related to <Artificial Intelligence Mathematics> is deemed essential. For effective teaching and learning in the <Artificial Intelligence Mathematics> curriculum, an appropriate learning path, at a minimum, involves progressing from <Mathematics> to <Mathematics I>, then to <Mathematics II>, and finally to <Artificial Intelligence Mathematics>.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.