Abstract

“Structured heterogeneity”, a founding concept of variationist sociolinguistics, puts focus on the ordered social differentiation in language. We extend the notion of structured heterogeneity to formal phonological structure, i.e., representations based on contrasts, with implications for phonetic implementation. Phonology establishes parameters for what varies and how. Patterns of stability and variability with respect to a given feature’s relationship to representations allow us to ground variationist analysis in a framework that makes predictions about potential sound changes: more structure correlates to more stability; less structure corresponds to more variability. However, even though all change requires variability, not all variability leads to change. Two case studies illustrate this asymmetry, keeping a focus on phonetic change with phonological stability. First, Germanic rhotics (r-sounds) from prehistory to the present day are minimally specified. They show tremendous phonetic variability and change but phonological stability. Second, laryngeal contrasts (voicing or aspiration) vary and change in language contact. We track the accumulation of phonetic change in unspecified members of pairs of the type spelled <s> ≠ <z>, etc. This analysis makes predictions about the regularity of sound change, situating regularity in phonology and irregularity in phonetics and the lexicon. Structured heterogeneity involves the variation inherent within the system for various levels of phonetic and phonological representation. Phonological change, then, is about acquiring or learning different abstract representations based on heterogeneous and variable input.

Highlights

  • STRUCTURE AND VARIATIONSound change is one of the oldest areas of linguistic inquiry, and is today an area of vibrant and rapid progress

  • With a focus on variation and sound change, we have argued for the need to integrate phonological theory and phonetics in new ways to understand sound change while taking seriously the notion of ‘structured heterogeneity’

  • A clearer picture of sound change emerges through investigation and analysis of both the ‘structure’ and the ‘heterogeneity’ of sound patterns

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Sound change is one of the oldest areas of linguistic inquiry, and is today an area of vibrant and rapid progress. The absence of structure (underspecification) corresponds to more variation, whereas phonological content limits the range of variation. Because variation is a requirement for change, we pursue the idea that specification or lack thereof correlates with what changes and how. We explore the idea that the lack of specification in some sense frees up properties of unspecified segments to be used to signal regional or social correlations, see Salmons (2020). We propose a move toward a model of phonology that captures the observation that “not all variability and heterogeneity in language structure involves change; but all change involves variability and heterogeneity”

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
THE TYPOLOGY OF LARYNGEAL CONTRAST AND CHANGE
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call