Abstract

We study the zero-temperature magnetization curve $(M\ensuremath{-}H$ curve) of the one-dimensional quantum antiferromagnet of spin one. The Hamiltonian H we consider is of the bilinear-biquadratic form: $H={\ensuremath{\sum}}_{i}f({s}_{i}\ensuremath{\cdot}{s}_{i+1})$ (+Zeeman term) where ${s}_{i}$ is the spin operator at site i and $f(X)=X+\ensuremath{\beta}{X}^{2}$ with $0<~\ensuremath{\beta}<1.$ We focus on validity of the $\ensuremath{\delta}$-function Bose-gas picture near the two critical fields: upper-critical field ${H}_{s}$ above which the magnetization saturates and the lower-critical field ${H}_{c}$ associated with the Haldane gap. As for the behavior near ${H}_{s},$ we take ``low-energy effective S matrix'' approach, where the correct effective Bose-gas coupling constant c is extracted from the two down-spin S matrix in its low-energy limit. We find that the resulting value of c differs from the spin-wave value. We draw the $M\ensuremath{-}H$ curve by using the resultant Bose gas, and compare it with numerical calculation where the product-wave-function renormalization-group (PWFRG) method, a variant of White's density-matrix renormalization group method, is employed. Excellent agreement is seen between the PWFRG calculation and the correctly mapped Bose-gas calculation. We also test the validity of the Bose-gas picture near the lower-critical field ${H}_{c}.$ Comparing the PWFRG-calculated $M\ensuremath{-}H$ curves with the Bose-gas prediction, we find that there are two distinct regions, I and II, of $\ensuremath{\beta}$ separated by a critical value ${\ensuremath{\beta}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\approx}0.41).$ In region I, $0<\ensuremath{\beta}<{\ensuremath{\beta}}_{c},$ the effective Bose coupling c is positive but rather small. The small value of c makes the ``critical region'' of the square-root behavior $M\ensuremath{\sim}\sqrt{H\ensuremath{-}{H}_{c}}$ very narrow. Further, we find that in the $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\ensuremath{\beta}}{\ensuremath{\beta}}_{c}\ensuremath{-}0,$ the square-root behavior transmutes to a different one, $M\ensuremath{\sim}(H\ensuremath{-}{H}_{c}{)}^{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ with $\ensuremath{\theta}\ensuremath{\approx}1/4.$ In region II, ${\ensuremath{\beta}}_{c}<\ensuremath{\beta}<1,$ the square-root behavior is more pronounced as compared with region I, but the effective coupling c becomes negative.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.