Abstract

The article deals with the dynamics of the semantic complex of dominant units in poetic text. Units of poetic text are divided into constant and dominant ones. Constant units realize the function of the context formation. They have one clear meaning. Dominant units realize the function of semantization. They are poly-interpretative. The methodology of the work is based on the theory of intertextuality which is viewed from the position of structural, interpretative and lingua-cultural approaches. The brief typology and characteristics of intertextual relations are given: auto- (self-quotations, self-allusions), in- (quotations, allusions), para- (structural and compositional units of a text such as a title, an epigraph, etc.) and arch-textuality (genre imitation; referring to well-known artistic images or cultural phenomena). The paper presents the model of analysis of dominant units in poetic text. The analysis is carried out in five steps: fragmentation, contextual analysis, search and determination of intertextual relations between the analyzed unit and units of address texts, contextual analysis of address texts, synthesis of the obtained contextual meanings. The practical material under study is the poem Elegy by the Canadian poet L. Cohen. The unit of analysis is the personal pronoun he in the given poetic text. The paper establishes intertextual relations between Elegy and texts from Greek mythology, the Holy Bible, Christian culture, and other works by L. Cohen. The conducted analysis shows that intertextual relations between the studied units initiate exchange and superimposition of their context meanings. As a result, the studied unit can have several meanings (some of which are not present in dictionaries but unique for the given author) within the same context. In this way, the dynamics of the semantic complex of the studied units and poetic text is realized.

Highlights

  • Фрагментация поэтического текста “Elegy”Анализируемое стихотворение открывает первый поэтический сборник Л.

  • Коэна “Let Us Compare Mythologies” («Давайте сравним мифологии») (1956).

  • В этом сборнике представлены стихи, написанные на мифологические, религиозные и философские темы.

Read more

Summary

Фрагментация поэтического текста “Elegy”

Анализируемое стихотворение открывает первый поэтический сборник Л. Коэна “Let Us Compare Mythologies” («Давайте сравним мифологии») (1956). В этом сборнике представлены стихи, написанные на мифологические, религиозные и философские темы. Do not examine the angry rivers 5.

Вычленение и анализ контекстных значений ДЕ he в поэтическом тексте “Elegy”
Контекстуальный анализ ДЕ he в адресных текстах
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.