Abstract
The article is devoted to such a kind of interpretation of the norms of hereditary and family legislation as contra legem. The reasons for the existence of this kind of interpretation are indicated. The position on its inadmissibility is analyzed. Examples of contra legem interpretation of the norms of inheritance and family legislation by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and lower courts are considered. The question of whether it is possible to put an equal sign between the type of interpretation under consideration and the analogy of the law is investigated. It is concluded that the interpretation of contra legem is rarely used by courts and is based on relevant principles of law.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
