Abstract

The purpose of the article is to describe electoral models in the national republics of the Siberian Federal District of the Russian Federation. The elections of the federal, regional and local levels in the republics of Tyva, Altai, Khakassia (2007–2019) are analyzed. The study is based on statistical and comparative analysis methods for three groups of indicators: 1) statistics on voter turnout and the level of support for the «United Russia» party; 2) socio-economic indicators of regional development; 3) ethnic localization of the population and the level of urbanization. The sources of research are official statistics, electoral statistics of republican election commissions. The results of the analysis allow us to identify the characteristics and differences in the electoral models of the republics based on the analyzed indicators. The Republic of Tyva represents the most conservative clientist political model with signs of institutionalization. The pattern of traditionalist electoral behavior of ethnically localized and low-urbanized communities with a high density of social ties and personal contacts, administratively controlled due to financial dependence on the Central budget and subsidies, is constantly reproduced. The Altai Republic is a less conservative model associated with the demonstrated electoral absenteeism of the majority ofthe voters. The active part of the electorate has a tendency to transform electoral patterns over the course of two cycles. The electoral patterns of the Republic of Khakassia demonstrate a non-conformist electoral pattern of the active electorate, which is due to the lower dependence of the population on budget transfers and social payments, and a higher level of income than in other republics under consideration. It should be noted that the level of support for the ruling party has gradually decreased, even with the most administrated and clientist voting patterns, and that absentee electoral behavior patterns have been transformed into a more active political position expressed through protest voting.

Highlights

  • The results of the analysis allow us to identify the characteristics and differences in the electoral models of the republics based on the analyzed indicators

  • The Altai Republic is a less conservative model associated with the demonstrated electoral absenteeism of the majority ofthe voters

  • The electoral patterns of the Republic of Khakassia demonstrate a non-conformist electoral pattern of the active electorate, which is due to the lower dependence of the population on budget transfers and social payments, and a higher level of income than in other republics under consideration

Read more

Summary

Выборы депутатов органов представительства административных центров

Приведенных в таблице, и опираясь на ряд критериев, используемых в такого рода исследованиях, можно выявить особенности, характерные для электоральных моделей рассматриваемых национальных республик. На выборах в административных центрах уровень поддержки партии власти не ниже 73% за два электоральных цикла, в отличие от федерального уровня процент повышается (+5,87% в 2018 г.), но отстает как от региональных, так и от федеральных цифр в среднем на 4–5%. Можно обнаружить корреляции между повышением/снижением явки: на федеральных выборах чем выше явка, тем ниже процент поддержки «Единой России» Уровень лояльности к партии «Единая Россия» в Республике Алтай на федеральных выборах заметно ниже, чем в Тыве, но почти приближался в 2011 г. Сформулируем эту зависимость: чем выше показатели уровня доходов и занятости населения, при этом ниже показатели безработицы и зависимости от социальных выплат в структуре доходов населения, тем вероятнее объективация паттерна активного протестного политического поведения и снижение уровня поддержки правящей партии при повышении явки. Приводим эти данные на основании отчетности службы государственной статистики [12] по показателям социально-экономического развития регионов в табл. 3

Социальные выплаты
Findings
Средневзвешенный коэффициент по РФ
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.