Abstract
This article contains examples of procedural errors in expert actions, practical nuances that can affect the quality and results of the examination, the subtleties of preparation for the study in terms of interaction between the bodies of inquiry, investigation and court with experts. Procedural errors in the implementation of expert judicial research of materials presented as material evidence may have different origins — from the technical features of the examination and the level of expertise of the expert to external reasons caused by the imperfection of the system of interaction between investigative and expert units. The author is interested in the aspect of a broad topic — the impact of expert activity on the likelihood of investigative and judicial errors and the possibility of codification of certain provisions and changes in legislation, allowing to adjust the powers of experts in a specific, unambiguously interpreted framework. Typical examples of procedural expert errors are given.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
