Abstract

본 연구는 보청천 하도형태의 변화를 해석하기 위해 1차원 유사이동 모형인 HEC-6 모형과 준 2차원 유사이동 모형인 GSTARS 2.1 모형을 적용하였다. GSTARS 2.1 모형에 포함된 Ackers와 White공식, Engelund와 Hanson공식 그리고 Yang공식의 세 가지 유사이송공식이 1993년부터 2000년까지의 하상재료에 대해 모의되었으며, 그 결과 Ackers와 White공식이 실측치에 근사한 것으로 나타났다. 1차원 유사이동 모형인 HEC-6모형과 GSTARS 2.1 모형과의 장기 하상변동 분석에 있어서 두 모형 모두 하천변화에 대한 전반적인 경향이 실측치의 하상변동 경향의 결과와 유사했다. 실측치와의 횡단면 변화의 비교에서 GSTARS 2.1 모형이 HEC-6모형의 모의결과보다 양호한 결과를 나타내었다. In this study, one dimensional sediment movement numerical model(HEC-6) and semi-two dimensional sediment movement numerical model(GSTARS 2.1) were applied to solve the change of channel geometry in Bocheong stream. GSTARS 2.1 model was applied for the three selected sediment transport formulas(Ackers and White's, Engelund and Hanson, Yang formula) from 1993 to 2000 measured data on each section. The simulation results of Ackers and White formula for long -term bed changes are good when compared to the measured data. The HEC-6 model was applied for the simulation of one dimensional sediment movement for the same period. Comparison of the long-term simulations by GSTARS 2.1 and HEC-6 models with measured data shows that simulations by both models are in fair agreement with measured data in overall trend of the river bed changes. Comparisons of simulated cross sectional bed-elevations with measured data shows that GSTARS 2.1 model gives better agreement with than simulated results bed changes on the HEC-6 model.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.