메타의 메타: 한국어교육 분야 ‘지식 종합 방법’에 대한 총괄적 문헌 고찰 - 한국어 학습자 요인 관련 연구 동향 분석 논문을 중심으로 -

Abstract

Secondary research, including research trend analysis, plays a role in curation in the relevant academic field, so there is a significant lack of critical reflection due to absolute belief in such research. This study examines secondary research by trend analysis of various aspects of Korean learners as the target of analysis. In other words, the method of systematic literature review in the field of Korean language education is less systematic than in the medical field and shows the aspect of “revised systematic literature review”. As the first tertiary study in the field of Korean language education, this study discusses the selection of the target literature, the coding of the target literature, the evaluation of the target literature, and the synthesis of the results of the research trend analysis studies on the factor of Korean learners. As a result, the following suggestions can be made: first, when coding the analysis of target literature, it is necessary to conduct secondary research to examine the interaction between factors; second, several studies apply a representative measurement tool (questionnaire), which has guaranteed domestic and international reliability, to study the affective factors and psychological factors (anxiety, etc.) of Korean learners need to take a look; third, looking at research trends targeting one specific native language learner group is limited in identifying the characteristics of the corresponding learner group, so it is more persuasive when discussing the characteristics of each group through comparison between various native language learners groups; fourth, the most desirable and eclectic way to set a coding framework is to present a new revision framework by modifying and supplementing existing coding standards while conducting open coding based on deductive coding standards. The key characteristics and procedures of the methodologies related to literature review were briefly introduced through the discussion of this paper, as well as the detailed review of the performance of literature review papers in the field of Korean education, which contributes to the qualitative improvement of secondary research in the field of Korean education. (Yonsei University)