Abstract
Introduction: the article draws attention to the fact that the subject of philosophical and legal discussion no longer includes issues of deep order. Questions of the influence of disciplines on each other remain out of sight. Among those is the question of the lesson that philosophy teaches to law in the modern era. The search for an answer to this question points to the changing attitude of philosophy towards the phenomenon of knowledge. The cognitive aspect of the problem is related to the new understanding of the real meaning of knowledge, its extensiveness. Today philosophy declares and justifies the thesis of knowledge as a new form of being. Purpose: by testing the philosophical hypothesis, to establish that knowledge has always taken place but as a form of being it was long in the shadow of consciousness. In the new reality, knowledge transformed into the dominant format. Methods: comparative and historical analysis. Results: the study confirmed both the validity of the philosophical approach to knowledge as a form of being and the claim of this phenomenon to the status of a new form of law. Knowledge exists in three key and inextricably interrelated hypostases: as an object of evolution of public consciousness; as a result of concrete historical development; as an object of everyday life, when legal knowledge about an incident is developed ‘here and now’ by participants in legal proceedings.
Highlights
The debate of philosophers and lawyers usually revolves around the following questions: What is philosophy of law? What potential does it have as a science? What are the subject and methods of this discipline, and what distinguishes it from other sciences of the kind? Dynamics of their polemics is well known, and chances that it may change are rather unlikely and predictable
What else have been said but have not been heard through the ages? Why did we omit and did not hear it? Why did not we discover, did not analyze, and did not adopt Protagoras methods, which allowed to obtain the kind of knowledge that survived for centuries and remained true? Does modern science continue to develop the criminal law knowledge mostly through practice, in a timeconsuming way? Why does not science ever study these aspects? To answer these questions, we should consider what type of scientific reason was used by scientists, i.e. a particular set of rules used by legal actors to understand or explain the social realm including criminal reality
The results of the study confirm the validity of the philosophical approach to knowledge as a form of being and the claim of this phenomenon to the status of a new form of law
Summary
А. Знание как новая форма права // Вестник Пермского университета. В частности, не рассматривается вопрос о том, как в современную эпоху соотносятся философия и право. Сегодня философия заявляет и обосновывает тезис о знании как новой форме бытия. Цель: проверкой философской гипотезы установить, что знание всегда имело место, но как форма бытия долгое время находилось в тени сознания. В новой реальности знание вследствие трансформации обрело доминирующий формат. Результаты: установлена и обоснованность философского подхода к знанию как к форме бытия, и претензии этого явления на статус новой формы права. Ключевые слова: право; философия права; гносеология права; эпистемология права; философия уголовного права; знание; уголовно-правовое знание; форма бытия; форма права; чувство; воля.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
