Морфологическая характеристика коронавирусной инфекции первой и второй волн пандемии

Abstract

Introduction. A peculiarity of the first two waves of the epidemic of a novel coronavirus infection was that during their development only diagnostic methods, treatment regimens and anti-epidemic measures were only being developed, there were no vaccines and no mass vaccination was carried out. In this regard, the pandemic of the novel coronavirus infection of the first two waves is characterized by spontaneous progression of the disease. Aim of the research. Comparative study of morphological and clinical features of the novel coronavirus infection in the 1st and 2nd waves of the pandemic in 2020. Materials and methods. The autopsy protocols of deceased patients at the City Clinical Hospital No. 1 (Novosibirsk) during the 1st (May — June 2020) (1st group) and 2nd (October — December 2020) (2nd group) waves of the epidemic were analyzed. The 1st group included 30 cases, that is 14 women (46.7%) and 16 men (53.3%), in the 2nd — 110 cases, of which 43 were women (39.1%) and 67 – men (60.9%). In all cases, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal swabs from the patients was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction. Results. The novel coronavirus infection (coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), ICD-10 code: U07.1) as the principal diagnosis in both the 1st and 2nd waves was recorded in more than 66% of observations. Among the comorbidities, the circulatory and endocrine disorders (primarily diabetes mellitus and obesity), kidneys and urinary tract diseases, mainly chronic pyelonephritis, prevailed. The COVID-19 pneumonia was predominantly bilateral polysegmental serоhemorrhagic in nature, however, in the 1st wave of the pandemic, the frequency of subtotal and seropurulent pneumonias was higher than in patients hospitalized during the 2nd wave. Diffuse alveolar damage in the 1st wave of the epidemic was characterized by the predominance of the early (exudative) phase of inflammation, in contrast to the 2nd wave, which was characterized by the predominance of the late (productive) phase in patients. Histologically, in patients of the 1st wave, the signs of exudative inflammation and hemorrhagic phenomena (with neutrophils and hyaline membranes in the alveoli, infarctions caused by thrombosis and pulmonary thromboembolism) prevailed. In the 2nd wave, signs of productive inflammation were more common in the lungs (predominance of macrophages in the alveoli, organizing pneumonia (pneumofibrosis), squamous cell metaplasia). Conclusion. The differences in the course of the novel coronavirus infection in the 1st and 2nd waves of the 2020 epidemic concerned primarily the frequency and structure of comorbidities and the level of polymorbidity, which were higher in patients during the 2nd wave. The severity of lung damage in patients of the 2nd wave was less pronounced: subtotal bilateral pneumonias were less common, lower lobe seropurulent pneumonias were more common. Diffuse alveolar damage in the 1st wave of the epidemic was characterized by the predominance of the early (exudative) phase, in contrast to the 2nd wave, which was characterized by the predominance of the late, productive phase of inflammation.