응용현상학과 임상의료윤리

Abstract

This paper explores the intersection of applied phenomenology and clinical medical ethics, focusing on the work of Richard M. Zaner. The paper discusses how philosophers often find themselves in a precarious position in the clinical environment, where their principles, concepts, and theories are not directly applicable to clinical practice. The core argument revolves around the concept of human dignity, autonomy, and the “situated subject” in the context of illness. Zaner's approach to clinical ethics counseling suggests a shift from traditional ethical decision-making processes to a more engaged and dialogical method. He emphasizes understanding the patient's experience and context, considering the complexities of human interaction and communication in medical settings. The paper elaborates on Zaner's life and major works, his commitment to phenomenology, and his significant contributions to medical ethics. Zaner's methodology in clinical encounters and ethical consultations is examined, showcasing his unique approach to addressing ethical dilemmas in healthcare. Two cases are presented to illustrate Zaner's method in practice. The first case discusses the ethical dilemmas surrounding a critically ill newborn and the parents' role in decision-making. The second case involves the ethical considerations in the treatment of a terminally ill patient, highlighting the complexities of family dynamics and decision-making processes. In conclusion, the paper asserts that Zaner's achievements demonstrate the potential benefits of a phenomenological approach to clinical ethics. It suggests that this approach can bridge the gap between theory and practice in medical ethics, providing a more holistic and empathetic way of addressing ethical issues in healthcare.