Abstract
This article discusses the issues of negative reception in theoretical interpretation and practical implementation. Certain types, features and political and legal consequences of forced reception are indicated. Separate types of reception are investigated as: forced, colonial, occupation and neocolonial. The practical aspects of the application and consequences of such a receipt in state legal systems are analyzed. The relevance of legal borrowing as the main method of institution and improvement of organizational and functional aspects of the national and foreign policy of the state is emphasized, provided that appropriate legal material is received, qualified and constructive incorporation of the received provisions into the national legal system, ensuring the harmonization of innovative regulatory material with functioning legal norms.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
