Abstract

Cultural heritage is regarded as an important cultural resource in local communities and provides various historical meanings to residents and visitors. However, the cultural heritage policy of Korea is inclined toward a centralized system despite increasing demands for decentralization of culture, mostly focusing on the preservation and protection of cultural heritage. Decentralization could promote the accountability and responsibility of the government through the devolution of authority to local governments. In this context, this article classifies the local government’s cultural heritage policy system into four categories–self-directed, proactive, improving, and dependent type – by investigating cases of Seoul, Incheon, Chungnam, Gyeongbuk, Gyeongnam, and Jeonnam. More importantly, this study explores conditions for the decentralization of the cultural heritage policy system in Korea through in-depth interviews with local public officials and researchers, drawing on the grounded-theory analysis method. These imply that some local governments, under centralized situation, make efforts to decentralize the cultural heritage policy by increasing manpower and budget, and delegating authority in addition to using their local cultural heritage.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.