Нарушения Уголовно-процессуального кодекса, связанные с процессом доказывания в правоприменительной практике

Abstract

The paper examines issues relating to violations of the Criminal Procedure Code in law enforcement practice, their types, the issues of reversal of court decisions on appeal when significant inconsistencies are found. The article explores theoretical and practical aspects of violations of criminal procedural legislation, which entails the inadmissibility of evidence. Based on judicial practice and scientific research, the author considers various types of violations, such as illegal searches, wrongful seizure of evidence, violation of interrogation rules and others. It is emphasized that the problem of reliability and admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings is quite relevant. In the course of court proceedings it is not uncommon that evidence available in the case was obtained with violations of the law. Based on judicial practice and scientific research, the author considers vari-ous types of violations, such as illegal search, illegal seizure of evidence, non-compliance with the rules of in-terrogation and others. It is emphasized that the problem of reliability and admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings is quite relevant. In the course of court proceedings it is not uncommon that evidence available in the case was obtained with violations of the law. Conclusion is that the ability to correctly apply the existing le-gal norms in the process of preparation of evidence is the basis for the rapid disclosure of the case and its submission to the court.